feat(validation): add firewall validation for iptables/ufw rules #81
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
networking_validation.gowithValidateFirewallBlocksPortandValidateDockerFirewallBlocksPortto verify servers on 0.0.0.0 are not accessible from outsideinstance_validation.gofor better organizationRunFirewallValidationstandalone suite for comprehensive firewall testingValidateFirewallBlocksPortandValidateDockerFirewallBlocksPortintoRunInstanceLifecycleValidationThis validates that the iptables rules from BREV-2599 are working correctly by verifying that Docker containers binding to 0.0.0.0 on non-allowed ports cannot be reached from outside.
Validation Proof
Tested via PR #82 which flushed the DOCKER-USER iptables chain to simulate the vulnerable state:
Without iptables rules (vulnerable):
Result:
port 9999 is accessible from outside but should be blocked by firewall (attempt 1 succeeded)❌ FAILWith iptables rules (secure):
Result:
checkPortBlocked: confirmed port 9999 is blocked after 3 attempts✅ PASSTest plan