Conversation
TODO: make it opt-in so we can still test pybind11 w/ older cmake? TODO: it shouldn't rely on PYBIND11_COMPATIBILITY enabled TODO: everything else
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Just a rough initial sketch for #261. Quite some things can be reused from pybind11, especially the signature parsing. Other things such as detecting what's an enum or or what's a function have to be redone for nanobind.
Things to do:
argvsarg0?), that may also affect static/class/method distinctionRight now I don't think I can find time to finish this, wanted mainly to see how hard it would be -- it seems a manageable scope.