Mac dev 98396 amp #4
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
add acpi device "ADS8396" support. max98396 calls max_98373_hw_params due to same tdm slots configuration. max98396 calls max_98373_spk_codec_init for reusable max98373_dapm_routes. Signed-off-by: Mac Chiang <mac.chiang@intel.com>
macchian
force-pushed
the
mac-dev-98396-amp
branch
from
cc4889d to
84dc577
Compare
macchian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2025
These iterations require the read lock, otherwise RCU lockdep will splat: ============================= WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.17.0-rc3-00014-g31419c045d64 #6 Tainted: G O ----------------------------- drivers/base/power/main.c:1333 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 5 locks held by rtcwake/547: #0: 00000000643ab418 (sb_writers#6){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: file_start_write+0x2b/0x3a #1: 0000000067a0ca88 (&of->mutex#2){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x181/0x24b #2: 00000000631eac40 (kn->active#3){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x191/0x24b #3: 00000000609a1308 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: pm_suspend+0xaf/0x30b #4: 0000000060c0fdb0 (device_links_srcu){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: device_links_read_lock+0x75/0x98 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 547 Comm: rtcwake Tainted: G O 6.17.0-rc3-00014-g31419c045d64 #6 VOLUNTARY Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE Stack: 223721b3a80 6089eac6 00000001 00000001 ffffff00 6089eac6 00000535 6086e528 721b3ac0 6003c294 00000000 60031fc0 Call Trace: [<600407ed>] show_stack+0x10e/0x127 [<6003c294>] dump_stack_lvl+0x77/0xc6 [<6003c2fd>] dump_stack+0x1a/0x20 [<600bc2f8>] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x116/0x13e [<603d8ea1>] dpm_async_suspend_superior+0x117/0x17e [<603d980f>] device_suspend+0x528/0x541 [<603da24b>] dpm_suspend+0x1a2/0x267 [<603da837>] dpm_suspend_start+0x5d/0x72 [<600ca0c9>] suspend_devices_and_enter+0xab/0x736 [...] Add the fourth argument to the iteration to annotate this and avoid the splat. Fixes: 0679963 ("PM: sleep: Make async suspend handle suppliers like parents") Fixes: ed18738 ("PM: sleep: Make async resume handle consumers like children") Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250826134348.aba79f6e6299.I9ecf55da46ccf33778f2c018a82e1819d815b348@changeid Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
macchian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 28, 2026
…ked_inode() In btrfs_read_locked_inode() we are calling btrfs_init_file_extent_tree() while holding a path with a read locked leaf from a subvolume tree, and btrfs_init_file_extent_tree() may do a GFP_KERNEL allocation, which can trigger reclaim. This can create a circular lock dependency which lockdep warns about with the following splat: [6.1433] ====================================================== [6.1574] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [6.1583] 6.18.0+ #4 Tainted: G U [6.1591] ------------------------------------------------------ [6.1599] kswapd0/117 is trying to acquire lock: [6.1606] ffff8d9b6333c5b8 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x39/0x2f0 [6.1625] but task is already holding lock: [6.1633] ffffffffa4ab8ce0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat+0x195/0xc60 [6.1646] which lock already depends on the new lock. [6.1657] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [6.1667] -> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: [6.1677] fs_reclaim_acquire+0x9d/0xd0 [6.1685] __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x59/0x750 [6.1694] btrfs_init_file_extent_tree+0x90/0x100 [6.1702] btrfs_read_locked_inode+0xc3/0x6b0 [6.1710] btrfs_iget+0xbb/0xf0 [6.1716] btrfs_lookup_dentry+0x3c5/0x8e0 [6.1724] btrfs_lookup+0x12/0x30 [6.1731] lookup_open.isra.0+0x1aa/0x6a0 [6.1739] path_openat+0x5f7/0xc60 [6.1746] do_filp_open+0xd6/0x180 [6.1753] do_sys_openat2+0x8b/0xe0 [6.1760] __x64_sys_openat+0x54/0xa0 [6.1768] do_syscall_64+0x97/0x3e0 [6.1776] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [6.1784] -> #1 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}: [6.1794] lock_release+0x127/0x2a0 [6.1801] up_read+0x1b/0x30 [6.1808] btrfs_search_slot+0x8e0/0xff0 [6.1817] btrfs_lookup_inode+0x52/0xd0 [6.1825] __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x73/0x520 [6.1833] btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x11a/0x120 [6.1842] btrfs_log_inode+0x608/0x1aa0 [6.1849] btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x249/0xf80 [6.1857] btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x3e/0x60 [6.1865] btrfs_sync_file+0x431/0x690 [6.1872] do_fsync+0x39/0x80 [6.1879] __x64_sys_fsync+0x13/0x20 [6.1887] do_syscall_64+0x97/0x3e0 [6.1894] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [6.1903] -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [6.1913] __lock_acquire+0x15e9/0x2820 [6.1920] lock_acquire+0xc9/0x2d0 [6.1927] __mutex_lock+0xcc/0x10a0 [6.1934] __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x39/0x2f0 [6.1944] btrfs_evict_inode+0x20b/0x4b0 [6.1952] evict+0x15a/0x2f0 [6.1958] prune_icache_sb+0x91/0xd0 [6.1966] super_cache_scan+0x150/0x1d0 [6.1974] do_shrink_slab+0x155/0x6f0 [6.1981] shrink_slab+0x48e/0x890 [6.1988] shrink_one+0x11a/0x1f0 [6.1995] shrink_node+0xbfd/0x1320 [6.1002] balance_pgdat+0x67f/0xc60 [6.1321] kswapd+0x1dc/0x3e0 [6.1643] kthread+0xff/0x240 [6.1965] ret_from_fork+0x223/0x280 [6.1287] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [6.1616] other info that might help us debug this: [6.1561] Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> btrfs-tree-00 --> fs_reclaim [6.1503] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [6.1110] CPU0 CPU1 [6.1411] ---- ---- [6.1707] lock(fs_reclaim); [6.1998] lock(btrfs-tree-00); [6.1291] lock(fs_reclaim); [6.1581] lock(&delayed_node->mutex); [6.1874] *** DEADLOCK *** [6.1716] 2 locks held by kswapd0/117: [6.1999] #0: ffffffffa4ab8ce0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat+0x195/0xc60 [6.1294] #1: ffff8d998344b0e0 (&type->s_umount_key#40){++++}- {3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x37/0x1d0 [6.1596] stack backtrace: [6.1183] CPU: 11 UID: 0 PID: 117 Comm: kswapd0 Tainted: G U 6.18.0+ #4 PREEMPT(lazy) [6.1185] Tainted: [U]=USER [6.1186] Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME B560M-A AC, BIOS 2001 02/01/2023 [6.1187] Call Trace: [6.1187] <TASK> [6.1189] dump_stack_lvl+0x6e/0xa0 [6.1192] print_circular_bug.cold+0x17a/0x1c0 [6.1194] check_noncircular+0x175/0x190 [6.1197] __lock_acquire+0x15e9/0x2820 [6.1200] lock_acquire+0xc9/0x2d0 [6.1201] ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x39/0x2f0 [6.1204] __mutex_lock+0xcc/0x10a0 [6.1206] ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x39/0x2f0 [6.1208] ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x39/0x2f0 [6.1211] ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x39/0x2f0 [6.1213] __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x39/0x2f0 [6.1215] btrfs_evict_inode+0x20b/0x4b0 [6.1217] ? lock_acquire+0xc9/0x2d0 [6.1220] evict+0x15a/0x2f0 [6.1222] prune_icache_sb+0x91/0xd0 [6.1224] super_cache_scan+0x150/0x1d0 [6.1226] do_shrink_slab+0x155/0x6f0 [6.1228] shrink_slab+0x48e/0x890 [6.1229] ? shrink_slab+0x2d2/0x890 [6.1231] shrink_one+0x11a/0x1f0 [6.1234] shrink_node+0xbfd/0x1320 [6.1236] ? shrink_node+0xa2d/0x1320 [6.1236] ? shrink_node+0xbd3/0x1320 [6.1239] ? balance_pgdat+0x67f/0xc60 [6.1239] balance_pgdat+0x67f/0xc60 [6.1241] ? finish_task_switch.isra.0+0xc4/0x2a0 [6.1246] kswapd+0x1dc/0x3e0 [6.1247] ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10 [6.1249] ? __pfx_kswapd+0x10/0x10 [6.1250] kthread+0xff/0x240 [6.1251] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [6.1253] ret_from_fork+0x223/0x280 [6.1255] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [6.1257] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [6.1260] </TASK> This is because: 1) The fsync task is holding an inode's delayed node mutex (for a directory) while calling __btrfs_update_delayed_inode() and that needs to do a search on the subvolume's btree (therefore read lock some extent buffers); 2) The lookup task, at btrfs_lookup(), triggered reclaim with the GFP_KERNEL allocation done by btrfs_init_file_extent_tree() while holding a read lock on a subvolume leaf; 3) The reclaim triggered kswapd which is doing inode eviction for the directory inode the fsync task is using as an argument to btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode() - but in that call chain we are trying to read lock the same leaf that the lookup task is holding while calling btrfs_init_file_extent_tree() and doing the GFP_KERNEL allocation. Fix this by calling btrfs_init_file_extent_tree() after we don't need the path anymore and release it in btrfs_read_locked_inode(). Reported-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6e55113a22347c3925458a5d840a18401a38b276.camel@linux.intel.com/ Fixes: 8679d26 ("btrfs: initialize inode::file_extent_tree after i_mode has been set") Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
macchian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 28, 2026
The GPIO controller is configured as non-sleeping but it uses generic
pinctrl helpers which use a mutex for synchronization.
This can cause the following lockdep splat with shared GPIOs enabled on
boards which have multiple devices using the same GPIO:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
kernel/locking/mutex.c:591
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 12, name:
kworker/u16:0
preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0
6 locks held by kworker/u16:0/12:
#0: ffff0001f0018d48 ((wq_completion)events_unbound#2){+.+.}-{0:0},
at: process_one_work+0x18c/0x604
#1: ffff8000842dbdf0 (deferred_probe_work){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:
process_one_work+0x1b4/0x604
#2: ffff0001f18498f8 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at:
__device_attach+0x38/0x1b0
#3: ffff0001f75f1e90 (&gdev->srcu){.+.?}-{0:0}, at:
gpiod_direction_output_raw_commit+0x0/0x360
#4: ffff0001f46e3db8 (&shared_desc->spinlock){....}-{3:3}, at:
gpio_shared_proxy_direction_output+0xd0/0x144 [gpio_shared_proxy]
#5: ffff0001f180ee90 (&gdev->srcu){.+.?}-{0:0}, at:
gpiod_direction_output_raw_commit+0x0/0x360
irq event stamp: 81450
hardirqs last enabled at (81449): [<ffff8000813acba4>]
_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x74/0x78
hardirqs last disabled at (81450): [<ffff8000813abfb8>]
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x84/0x88
softirqs last enabled at (79616): [<ffff8000811455fc>]
__alloc_skb+0x17c/0x1e8
softirqs last disabled at (79614): [<ffff8000811455fc>]
__alloc_skb+0x17c/0x1e8
CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 12 Comm: kworker/u16:0 Not tainted
6.19.0-rc4-next-20260105+ #11975 PREEMPT
Hardware name: Hardkernel ODROID-M1 (DT)
Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func
Call trace:
show_stack+0x18/0x24 (C)
dump_stack_lvl+0x90/0xd0
dump_stack+0x18/0x24
__might_resched+0x144/0x248
__might_sleep+0x48/0x98
__mutex_lock+0x5c/0x894
mutex_lock_nested+0x24/0x30
pinctrl_get_device_gpio_range+0x44/0x128
pinctrl_gpio_direction+0x3c/0xe0
pinctrl_gpio_direction_output+0x14/0x20
rockchip_gpio_direction_output+0xb8/0x19c
gpiochip_direction_output+0x38/0x94
gpiod_direction_output_raw_commit+0x1d8/0x360
gpiod_direction_output_nonotify+0x7c/0x230
gpiod_direction_output+0x34/0xf8
gpio_shared_proxy_direction_output+0xec/0x144 [gpio_shared_proxy]
gpiochip_direction_output+0x38/0x94
gpiod_direction_output_raw_commit+0x1d8/0x360
gpiod_direction_output_nonotify+0x7c/0x230
gpiod_configure_flags+0xbc/0x480
gpiod_find_and_request+0x1a0/0x574
gpiod_get_index+0x58/0x84
devm_gpiod_get_index+0x20/0xb4
devm_gpiod_get_optional+0x18/0x30
rockchip_pcie_probe+0x98/0x380
platform_probe+0x5c/0xac
really_probe+0xbc/0x298
Fixes: 936ee26 ("gpio/rockchip: add driver for rockchip gpio")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/d035fc29-3b03-4cd6-b8ec-001f93540bc6@samsung.com/
Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260106090011.21603-1-bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.