-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 75
fix: Setup CI against enterprise #2299
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
407b9ca to
a4fa9ba
Compare
c679897 to
7bee426
Compare
MarkDuckworth
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approved with suggestions.
| // This is somewhat surprising because the pipeline did ask specifically for genre not | ||
| // equal to null, | ||
| // however at the later distinct stage, UNSET is grouped as null and thus null appears | ||
| // in the result. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1. That is surprising.
| .select( | ||
| field("rating").equal(nullValue()).as("ratingIsNull"), | ||
| field("rating").equal(Double.NaN).as("ratingIsNaN"), | ||
| // arrayGet("title", 0) evaluates to UNSET |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Was this intentionally left in?
| "__id1_", | ||
| "_id1__", | ||
| "a"); | ||
| // TODO: SDK now implements stardard backend order. We need to change it to Enterprise order |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just an idea. Why not make this sort order configurable? If it was a big enough deal to fix for standard edition last year, maybe we should still support the standard behavior with a config option.
| @@ -141,7 +141,8 @@ public void aggregateErrorMessageIfIndexIsMissing() throws Exception { | |||
| assumeFalse( | |||
| "Skip this test when running against the emulator because it does not require composite" | |||
| + " index creation.", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This comment may need updating to match the new behavior.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.