doc: fixing multiple typos - See commit diffs for details

[didier-durand]

Link to Issue or Description of Change

N/A

2. Or, if no issue exists, describe the change:

Fixing various typos in .py files to improve quality: see commit diffs for details

Problem:

See above

Solution:
Fixing the typos

Testing Plan

N/A

Unit Tests:

N/A

Manual End-to-End (E2E) Tests:

N/A

Checklist

• I have read the CONTRIBUTING.md document.
• I have performed a self-review of my own code.
• [N/A] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
• [N/A ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
• [N/A] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes.
• [N/A] I have manually tested my changes end-to-end.
• [N/A ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules.

Additional context

N/A

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @didier-durand, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on improving the overall quality and professionalism of the codebase and documentation by addressing a series of typographical errors and grammatical inconsistencies. The changes span across various files, including READMEs, Python source files, and test files, ensuring that descriptions, comments, and error messages are clear, accurate, and consistent. The primary goal is to enhance the user and developer experience by presenting well-written and error-free content.

Highlights

• Documentation Clarity: Corrected various grammatical errors and typos in README files and docstrings to enhance readability and accuracy across the project's documentation.
• Code Comments Refinement: Addressed spelling mistakes and inconsistent hyphenation in code comments, particularly in descriptions of functions, classes, and variables, improving code maintainability.
• Consistency in Terminology: Standardized terms like 'sub-directory' to 'subdirectory' and 'long running' to 'long-running' for better consistency throughout the codebase and documentation.
• Improved Error Descriptions: Fixed a typo in an error message description, changing 'an resources exhausted error' to 'a resources exhausted error' for grammatical correctness.
• Test File Corrections: Updated spelling in test file comments and assertions, such as 'rewinded' to 'rewound' and 'Licens' to 'License', ensuring test descriptions are accurate.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request addresses several typos and grammatical errors across documentation, comments, and code. All the changes are correct and improve the overall quality and readability of the codebase. I have no further comments on the code changes.

On a minor note, the pull request title and description themselves contain small typos ('Fix typos e' and 'Fixing the typose'). You might want to correct those for consistency.

[didier-durand]

Hi, I fixed the spelling issues in the PR itself as suggested by AI-based review.