Skip to content

Conversation

@kevinlin09
Copy link
Collaborator

@kevinlin09 kevinlin09 commented Jan 21, 2026

Description

[Describe what this PR does and why]

Related Issue: Fixes #[issue_number] or Relates to #[issue_number]

Security Considerations: [Check if API keys or sensitive credentials are exposed in code/logs]

Type of Change

  • Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Breaking change
  • Documentation
  • Refactoring

Component(s) Affected

  • Model
  • Application
  • Common
  • Documentation
  • Tests
  • CI/CD

Checklist

  • Pre-commit hooks pass
  • Tests pass locally
  • Documentation updated (if needed)
  • Ready for review

Testing

[How to test these changes]

Additional Notes

[Optional: any other context]

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @kevinlin09, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a security concern by eliminating the logging of API keys in the oss.upload command-line interface function. This change ensures that sensitive credentials are no longer inadvertently written to standard output or logs, thereby improving the overall security posture of the application.

Highlights

  • Security Enhancement: Removed the logging of the api_key parameter in the oss.upload function within the CLI, preventing sensitive information from being exposed in logs.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly addresses a critical security vulnerability by removing API key logging. This is an excellent and necessary change to prevent sensitive credential exposure. I've also included a suggestion regarding the use of print for logging, which could improve the maintainability of the CLI tool.

Comment on lines 227 to 229
print(
f"Start oss.upload: model={args.model}, file={args.file}, "
f"api_key={args.api_key}",
f"Start oss.upload: model={args.model}, file={args.file}",
)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

While this change correctly removes the API key from being logged, which is a critical security improvement, it's worth noting that using print() for logging application status is not ideal. It would be better to use a proper logging framework, like Python's logging module. This would provide more flexibility, such as controlling log verbosity and directing logs to different outputs (e.g., stderr or a file), separating them from the primary output of the CLI tool. The project already seems to have a logger set up in other modules (e.g., dashscope.utils.oss_utils), which could be leveraged here as well for better consistency.

@kevinlin09 kevinlin09 closed this Jan 21, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant