[RFC] Administrative Access to CFF Infrastructure#1415
Open
Conversation
Member
|
@christopherclark TOC would like to have your opinion on this. |
beyhan
requested changes
Feb 3, 2026
Member
beyhan
left a comment
beyhan
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We discussed that Slack also make sense to be added.
Member
|
We discussed this RFC during the TOC meeting on 3rd of February and decided to start the FCP with the goal to accept it. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As discussed during the TOC meeting 2 weeks ago, an RFC to grant TOC members Admin rights to more CFF managed resources (currently they only have admin rights on github in the cloudfoundry org).
Preview