[EXPERIMENT] Update resolver and use newly introduced method#428
Closed
cstamas wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Closed
[EXPERIMENT] Update resolver and use newly introduced method#428cstamas wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
cstamas wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
Member
|
I'm really interested in how this will work (ie use the newer resolver method) in plugins - that run in older maven 3.6.3 (as a replacement to m-artifact-transfer. |
Member
Author
|
Was m-a-t initial goal to "hide" org.sonatype vs org.eclipse resolver diffs? So to say maven 3.0 vs maven 3.1. Also, it is sitting between maven (core) and resolver (core), but m-a-t is not in core? -- correct me if am wrong. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Update resolver and make use of newly introduced method in apache/maven-resolver#87
This PR is NOT meant for merge as is, is more just an example.