Fix keyword parameter filtering in listBackupOfferings API

[JeevanYewale]

Fixes #12466

Problem

The keyword parameter in the listBackupOfferings API was not filtering results. Regardless of the search term provided, the API returned empty results even when matching offerings existed.

Root Cause

The SearchBuilder was using SearchCriteria.Op.EQ instead of SearchCriteria.Op.LIKE for the name field, preventing wildcard matching.

Solution

• Changed SearchBuilder operation from EQ to LIKE for the name field
• Enables proper wildcard matching with % symbols for keyword search

Testing

• Verified that list backupofferings keyword=test now returns matching results
• Confirmed backward compatibility with existing functionality

Impact

• Fixes broken keyword search functionality
• Minimal change with maximum impact (1 line changed)

[boring-cyborg]

Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache CloudStack community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check our Contribution Guide (https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
Here are some useful points:

• In case of a new feature add useful documentation (raise doc PR at https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation)
• Be patient and persistent. It might take some time to get a review or get the final approval from the committers.
• Pay attention to the quality of your code, ensure tests are passing and your PR doesn't have conflicts.
• Please follow ASF Code of Conduct for all communication including (but not limited to) comments on Pull Requests, Issues, Mailing list and Slack.
• Be sure to read the CloudStack Coding Conventions.
  Apache CloudStack is a community-driven project and together we are making it better 🚀.
  In case of doubts contact the developers at:
  Mailing List: dev@cloudstack.apache.org (https://cloudstack.apache.org/mailing-lists.html)
  Slack: https://apachecloudstack.slack.com/

[DaanHoogland]

clgtm

[DaanHoogland]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with no SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 17.84%. Comparing base (04b58ac) to head (74b0afc).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #12480      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     17.84%   17.84%   -0.01%     
+ Complexity    15983    15979       -4     
============================================
  Files          5929     5929              
  Lines        531084   531084              
  Branches      64914    64914              
============================================
- Hits          94795    94785      -10     
- Misses       425675   425685      +10     
  Partials      10614    10614              

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	3.58% <ø> (ø)
unittests	18.94% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 16459

[DaanHoogland]

@blueorangutan test

[blueorangutan]

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests