-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Feat/rapid 6800 batch url upload #459
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…g as no longer used
This reverts commit 7f72e01.
Pull Request Review: Batch URL Upload Feature (PR #459)I've completed a comprehensive review of this PR. Overall, this is a well-architected implementation of a batch URL upload feature with incremental datapoint creation. The code quality is high, but there are several areas that warrant attention. ✅ Strengths
🔴 Critical Issues1. Infinite Loop Risk in Polling (
|
| Category | Count |
|---|---|
| Critical Issues | 3 |
| Significant Issues | 4 |
| Code Quality | 4 |
| Security | 2 |
| Performance | 2 |
| Documentation | 2 |
Overall Assessment: This is a solid implementation with good architecture and documentation. The critical issues around infinite polling loops and partial batch failure handling should be addressed before merge. The code demonstrates strong engineering practices with proper type hints, error handling, and concurrency management.
Recommendation: Request changes to address critical issues #1, #2, and #3. Other issues can be addressed in follow-up PRs or documented as known limitations.
🎯 Action Items
Must Fix Before Merge:
- Add timeout mechanism to batch polling
- Fix cache encapsulation violation
- Handle partial batch submission failures
Should Fix Before Merge:
4. Add exception handling for progress bar cleanup
5. Add unit tests for new components
6. Document breaking changes in configuration
Consider for Follow-up:
7. Performance optimizations (adaptive polling, executor reuse)
8. Enhanced URL/path validation
9. Memory optimization for large datasets
Generated by Claude Code Review
Pull Request Review: Batch URL Upload Feature (RAPID-6800)OverviewThis PR introduces a significant architectural improvement by implementing batch URL uploading with a two-step upload process. The changes include 1,110 additions across 18 files, introducing new components for asset upload orchestration and batch processing. Positive AspectsArchitecture & Design
Code Quality
Issues & Concerns1. Thread-Safety: Potential Race Condition
|
| ) | ||
| batchSize: int = Field( | ||
| default=100, | ||
| description="Number of URLs per batch (10-500)", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why so small? I allow up to 10k
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i'm anyways sending all of them at once but the callback only gets triggered once a batch completes
| description="Polling interval in seconds", | ||
| ) | ||
| batchTimeout: float = Field( | ||
| default=300.0, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what does batchTimeout mean? like if the batch isn't done in that timeframe?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also be aware that in large orders we would be getting timeouts. Since the uploads are done sequentially and it's expected that our upload workers will get backlogged. meaning if the system is processing 10k uploads already even if you only upload 1 image it will not be processed until the previous 10k are done. I think it would make sense to set a threshold for batching instead. Meaning if more than 1k assets need to be uploaded we resort to batch upload, due to the sideeffects explained above
|
|
||
| def upload_all_assets( | ||
| self, | ||
| datapoints: list[Datapoint], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it's weird to me that the AssetUploadOrchestrator takes Datapoints, like he doens't care about datapoints, only assets, no?
| _file_cache_lock: threading.Lock = threading.Lock() | ||
|
|
||
| @classmethod | ||
| def _get_file_cache(cls) -> SingleFlightCache: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what is cls?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the class itself - it's there to make sure that the cache doesn't get instantiated upon the init method in case you disable disk caching
| ready_datapoints: list[int], | ||
| datapoints: list[Datapoint], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it's a bit weird that ready_datapoints is a list of int which corresponds to the index of the actual datapoints. like might aswell just have the datapoints directly
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
added some clarification to the docs. it's mainly for memory efficiency
PR Review: Batch URL Upload Feature (RAPID-6800)OverviewThis PR implements a significant architectural improvement by introducing a two-step upload process with batch URL uploading and incremental datapoint creation. The implementation adds ~1100 lines across several new modules. Code Quality & Architecture✅ Strengths
Issues & Concerns🔴 Critical Issues1. Race Condition in Cache Access (
|
Pull Request Review: Batch URL Upload FeatureSummaryThis PR introduces a significant enhancement to the upload infrastructure by implementing batch URL uploading with a two-step upload process. The implementation includes new orchestration classes, improved caching mechanisms, and incremental datapoint creation. Overall Assessment: The code is well-architected with good separation of concerns. However, there are several areas that need attention before merging. Code Quality & ArchitectureStrengths ✅
Potential Bugs & IssuesCritical Issues 🔴
Medium Issues 🟡
Security Concerns (Low Risk
|
Pull Request Review: Batch URL Upload FeatureOverviewThis PR introduces batch URL upload (RAPID-6800) with a two-step upload process. Changes: 1,115 additions, 80 deletions across 18 files. SummaryNew Components
Major Refactors
Removed
Code Quality: Strengths ✅
Critical Issues 🔴1. Infinite Loop Risk (
|
Pull Request Review: Batch URL Upload Feature (PR #459)OverviewThis PR implements a two-step batch upload system for URL assets, introducing incremental datapoint creation and significant architectural improvements. The changes are substantial (1156 additions, 80 deletions across 18 files). StrengthsArchitecture & Design
Code Quality
Critical Issues1. Potential Deadlock Risk - _rapidata_dataset.py:1158-1163If asset upload callbacks are still trying to submit datapoint creation tasks while shutdown(wait=True) is called, this could cause a deadlock. 2. Cache Direct Storage Access - _asset_upload_orchestrator.py:389Code directly accesses cache._storage (private attribute) instead of using proper API. This breaks encapsulation. 3. Incomplete Error Handling - _batch_asset_uploader.py:692-693When batch submission fails, the URLs in that batch are never tracked and won't be included in failure results. Other Issues4. Performance: Busy Waiting - _batch_asset_uploader.py:709-710Busy-wait loop checks every 0.5 seconds. Could use a Condition variable for more efficient signaling. 5. Configuration: Inconsistent Documentation - upload_config.py:92-94Default batchSize is 1000, validator checks >= 100. Documentation says (100-5000) but there is no upper bound validation. 6. Missing TestsNo tests were added for: BatchAssetUploader concurrent batch submission and polling, AssetUploadOrchestrator incremental datapoint triggering, Thread-safety of shared state in RapidataDataset, Error recovery scenarios. 7. Breaking Change: Configuration - upload_config.py:100cacheUploads renamed to cacheToDisk - this is a breaking change for existing users. Performance ConsiderationsPositives:
Concerns:
Security ConsiderationsGood practices: No credentials in cache keys, proper validation of batch sizes, exception messages do not leak sensitive data. Potential issues:
Test Coverage AssessmentCurrent: No tests added for new functionality Overall AssessmentCode Quality: 4/5 Recommendation: REQUEST CHANGES - The architecture and code quality are excellent, but the lack of tests for complex concurrent code and the few critical bugs need to be addressed before merging. Great work on the overall design! The incremental datapoint creation is a clever optimization. Once the issues above are addressed, this will be a solid feature. |
PR Review: Batch URL Upload Feature (RAPID-6800)SummaryThis PR implements a two-step batch upload system for URL assets, significantly improving upload efficiency. The implementation includes new orchestration classes, enhanced caching, and incremental datapoint creation. Strengths
Critical Issues1. Race condition in _poll_until_complete() (line 106-107 in _batch_asset_uploader.py) 2. Validation mismatch in upload_config.py
High Priority Issues3. Direct access to _storage attribute (line 254 in _asset_upload_orchestrator.py) 4. Daemon thread may lose errors (line 100-102) 5. Missing validation
Medium Priority6. Inconsistent error handling 7. Potential infinite loop 8. Broad exception catching Test Coverage GapCRITICAL: No tests for 1165 new lines of concurrent code
Performance Notes
Minor Issues
Overall AssessmentCode Quality: 8/10 | Security: 9/10 | Performance: 8/10 | Test Coverage: 2/10 | Documentation: 9/10 Recommendation: Request Changes |
PR Review: Feat/RAPID-6800 Batch URL UploadSummaryThis PR implements a significant architectural improvement by introducing a two-step batch upload process for URL assets. The changes include:
Code Quality & Best Practices ⭐Strengths:
Potential Bugs & Issues
|
Pull Request Review: Batch URL Upload Feature (PR #459)OverviewThis PR introduces a significant enhancement to the asset upload system by implementing batch URL uploads with concurrent processing. The changes include new orchestration layers, improved caching mechanisms, and incremental datapoint creation. Code Quality & ArchitectureStrengths ✅
Areas for Improvement 🔧
Performance ConsiderationsPositive Performance Impacts ⚡
Potential Performance Issues
|
PR Review: Batch URL Upload Feature (RAPID-6800)OverviewThis PR implements a two-step batch upload process for URL assets with incremental datapoint creation. Well-structured with good separation of concerns. Strengths
Issues Found1. Missing Upper Bound Validation (upload_config.py:47)Documentation says batch size is 100-5000 but validator only checks >= 100. Add upper bound check. 2. Documentation Mismatch (upload_config.py:24)Comment says 10-500 but default is 1000. Update documentation. 3. Error Tracking Gap (_batch_asset_uploader.py:96-97)Failed batch submissions are logged but not tracked properly for error reporting. 4. Unbounded Futures List (_rapidata_dataset.py:88)For large datasets (10k+ datapoints), all futures held in memory. Consider incremental processing or document memory requirements. 5. Unused Import (_batch_asset_uploader.py:10)BatchUploadStatus imported but not used. Security
Test Coverage - CRITICAL GAP1,243 lines added with NO tests. Need tests for:
PerformanceGood: Batch uploads, concurrent polling, in-memory cache RecommendationsHigh Priority:
Medium Priority: Low Priority: SummaryWell-designed implementation with excellent concurrency model. Main concern is lack of tests. Fix validation issues and add tests before merging. Great work on the incremental datapoint creation design! |
No description provided.