Skip to content

Conversation

@akutschera
Copy link
Collaborator

Now you can do "without(String.class)" and you will not have any field set that is of this type.

This should work with nested objects, too.

Now you can do "without(String.class)" and you will not have any
field set that is of this type.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants