Open
Conversation
Collaborator
Author
🔗 Additional ContextOriginal Blog Post: https://trustedsec.com/blog/ldap-channel-binding-and-ldap-signing Content Categories: Based on the analysis, this content was categorized under "Windows Hardening -> Active Directory Methodology (or a new subpage under AD for "LDAP Relay/MITM Mitigations: LDAP Signing & Channel Binding")". Repository Maintenance:
Review Notes:
Bot Version: HackTricks News Bot v1.0 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🤖 Automated Content Update
This PR was automatically generated by the HackTricks News Bot based on a technical blog post.
📝 Source Information
🎯 Content Summary
Title/Context (TrustedSec, Jan 29, 2026)
The post explains two distinct Active Directory (AD) hardening controls—LDAP Channel Binding and LDAP Signing—and why they matter for stopping real-world person-in-the-middle, relay/forwarding, and replay-style abuse of LDAP authentication flows (i.e., an attacker positioning between an application/system and the Domain Controller (DC) to obtain a “valid authentication ticket”). It emphasizes that many environ...
🔧 Technical Details
LDAP Channel Binding (CBT) anti-relay hardening: When LDAP binds occur over SSL/TLS (LDAPS), bind the authentication to the specific TLS tunnel by requiring Channel Binding Tokens (CBTs). Deploy by setting the DC policy “Domain controller: LDAP server channel binding token requirements” to “When Supported” first to generate audit events (e.g., 3039 plus the KB4520412 “what-if” events 3074/3075 on Server 2019/2022 DCs), then switch to “Always” to reject LDAPS binds that omit CBT data or would fail CBT validation, thereby preventing forwarded/relayed authentication across different TLS channels.
LDAP Signing integrity + relay resistance: Require clients to cryptographically sign LDAP requests so DCs reject unsigned authentication requests and detect message tampering. Implement in two places: (1) client-side GPO “Network security: LDAP client signing requirements = Require signing”, and (2) DC-side signing requirements (“Require signing” on older DC policy; on Server 2025 DCs us...
🤖 Agent Actions
Summary:
Testing:
This PR was automatically created by the HackTricks Feed Bot. Please review the changes carefully before merging.