Skip to content

Conversation

@nbarros
Copy link

@nbarros nbarros commented Jan 30, 2026

Integrate CIB DAQ modules into the latest dunedaq model

This PR introduces a new application that is meant to interface the CIB with dunedaq. The schema and corresponding application has been based off the CTB implementation, taking in consideration the differences between the two systems.

The schema describes the configuration of both the accompanying cibmodules, and the board itself (only the portion related to the dunedaq - the remainder of the operation is controlled through slow control).

The new code requires the at NP02 to be operating, either in simulation mode (generating fake triggers), or in actual data taking mode. The IoLS group should be contacted if there are intentions to test the code, so that arrangements can be made.

Type of change

  • Documentation (non-breaking change that adds or improves the documentation)
  • New feature or enhancement (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Optimization (non-breaking change that improves code/performance)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Breaking change (whatever its nature)

Testing checklist

  • Unit tests pass (e.g. dbt-build --unittest)
  • Minimal system quicktest passes (pytest -s minimal_system_quick_test.py)
  • Full set of integration tests pass (daqsystemtest_integtest_bundle.sh)
  • Python tests pass if applicable (e.g. python -m pytest)
  • Pre-commit hooks run successfully if applicable (e.g. pre-commit run --all-files)

The changes affect exclusively the interface with the CIB, and operational tests have been carried out successfully

Further checks

  • Code is commented where needed, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • Code style is correct (dbt-build --lint, and/or see https://dune-daq-sw.readthedocs.io/en/latest/packages/styleguide/)
  • If applicable, new tests have been added or an issue has been opened to tackle that in the future.
    (Indicate issue here: # (issue))

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant