Skip to content

Conversation

@maxnoe
Copy link
Contributor

@maxnoe maxnoe commented Oct 7, 2025

BEGINRELEASENOTES
*RucioFileCatalog
fix: add missing option in RucioFileCatalog.getUserMetadataBulk
ENDRELEASENOTES

cc @cserf @gillardoLapp

@aldbr
Copy link
Contributor

aldbr commented Feb 4, 2026

Hi @maxnoe,
Any reason this PR is still in draft? Do you need anything from us?

Thanks

@maxnoe
Copy link
Contributor Author

maxnoe commented Feb 5, 2026

I wanted to get feedback from @cserf, but from my side, this is ready

@maxnoe maxnoe marked this pull request as ready for review February 5, 2026 08:41
@maxnoe
Copy link
Contributor Author

maxnoe commented Feb 5, 2026

A question would maybe be if hard-coding "ALL" is a good idea, or if I could introduce a new configuration option here?

How would that work?

I think to make the Rucio interface more general, we will need a couple of more configuration options here in the future.

@maxnoe maxnoe force-pushed the rucio-meta-consistent branch from f40dfe1 to ffb7402 Compare February 5, 2026 08:43
@maxnoe maxnoe force-pushed the rucio-meta-consistent branch from ffb7402 to 6f4c05c Compare February 5, 2026 08:44
@aldbr aldbr requested a review from cserf February 5, 2026 16:51
@cserf
Copy link

cserf commented Feb 5, 2026

I agree that having the possibility to choose the plugin would be good. Could be something done in the future.

@aldbr
Copy link
Contributor

aldbr commented Feb 6, 2026

I merge this PR.
If you need further flexibility and configuration, you can open an issue (feature request) explaining what you would like to have exactly.

Thanks 🙂

@aldbr aldbr merged commit 6f8cc97 into DIRACGrid:integration Feb 6, 2026
23 checks passed
@DIRACGridBot DIRACGridBot added the sweep:ignore Prevent sweeping from being ran for this PR label Feb 6, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

sweep:ignore Prevent sweeping from being ran for this PR

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants