Skip to content

Conversation

@Bencheng21
Copy link
Contributor

@Bencheng21 Bencheng21 commented Feb 5, 2026

today.
image

these two fields should be on the bottom

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Internal configuration structure reorganization with no impact to user-facing functionality.

@Bencheng21 Bencheng21 requested a review from a team February 5, 2026 20:02
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 5, 2026

Walkthrough

Configuration field ordering was adjusted in the Config initialization method: syncSecrets and omitArchivedRepositories were repositioned from after instanceUrlField to after orgField. No functional logic, validation, or exported signatures were modified.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Configuration Field Reordering
pkg/config/config.go
Reordered configuration fields in NewConfiguration: moved syncSecrets and omitArchivedRepositories to follow orgField instead of instanceUrlField. No semantic changes or field additions/removals.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰 The fields hop and skip in a brand new line,
Rearranged with care, a config design,
No logic bent, no function torn,
Just a tidy dance—configuration reborn! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'baton-github: reorder fields' accurately and concisely describes the main change: reordering configuration fields in the GitHub connector.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch ben/reorganize

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@gontzess gontzess left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does anything in C1 save these in database and expect them in a different order? Don't know enough about how C1 handles the ordering, but just want to make sure this isn't a breaking change

@Bencheng21 Bencheng21 requested a review from a team February 5, 2026 23:27
@Bencheng21
Copy link
Contributor Author

Does anything in C1 save these in database and expect them in a different order? Don't know enough about how C1 handles the ordering, but just want to make sure this isn't a breaking change

I think c1 save these in database, but I don't think the order matters in c1.

@Bencheng21 Bencheng21 merged commit e08ea18 into main Feb 6, 2026
10 of 12 checks passed
@Bencheng21 Bencheng21 deleted the ben/reorganize branch February 6, 2026 00:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants