Conversation
Updates (Feb 4, 2026)Per reviewer feedback:
|
|
Per Wolf's feedback: removed |
Updates (2026-02-04)Renumbering
Content
RelatedThis PR is part of a coordinated suite of 8 BCRs for attribution, authority, and endorsement predicates. See PR #151 for the complete overview of the suite structure. |
Proposes Known Values for neutral observer attestation: observerWitness, observationTimestamp, observerIndependence, observationScope, etc. Community range 1120-1124. Seeking rough consensus; willing to use 100000+ if community prefers. Signed-off-by: Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@LifeWithAlacrity.com>
Part of coordinated suite renumbering. BCR-2026-004 (Signing Event Attestations) was inserted, shifting all subsequent numbers. Codepoint range unchanged: 1100-1104 Signed-off-by: Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@LifeWithAlacrity.com>
ac774b1 to
bdf0e37
Compare
Per Wolf's recommendation: use temporary letter designations. Actual BCR numbers will be assigned at merge time. Updated all internal cross-references to XXX format. Signed-off-by: Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@LifeWithAlacrity.com>
Clarifies that observerWitness identifies a person who observed facts (human attestation), while sig:Witnessed is a commitment type enum describing a signer's intent. Different subjects, different purposes. Signed-off-by: Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@LifeWithAlacrity.com>
|
Added distinction note clarifying Key point: |
Proposes Known Values for Fair Witness attestations in Gordian Envelopes — human observation with explicit acknowledgment of limitations.
Predicates defined:
observerWitness— The entity making the observationobservationTimestamp— When the observation was madeobserverIndependence— Relationship disclosure (independent, affiliated, etc.)observationScope— What was and wasn't directly observedobservationMethodology— How the observation was conductedCodepoints: Community range 1120-1124
Based on the Fair Witness concept: reporting only direct observations with acknowledged limitations, distinguishing observed facts from interpretation.
Seeking rough consensus; willing to use 100000+ range if community prefers.