Fix a race condition in Discovery/endpoint creation#398
Merged
Conversation
…s done to avoid a data race (DP event loop sends the notification after it has created the endpoint)
Member
|
Fix released in 0.11.8 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This fixes a race condition, which was present because the AddEndpoint (reader/writer) commands were processed concurrently in DP event loop & Discovery. The fix is to move sending the Discovery command from the user-level function to DP event loop, which sends the command after it has actually created the RTPS endpoint.
Here's an example of how the race condition resulted in local-remote endpoints not matching:
Pros:
Cons: