PLAN B: Add "Ruby" as new required ecosystem choice to sit beside "RubyGems" ecosystem
If PR#1796 is too much of a change to do ALL-AT-ONCE, then I suggest adding Ruby as new required ecosystem choice to sit beside "RubyGems" ecosystem**
This definition of the new "Ruby" ecosystem would be yes ruby but not RubyGem (not on RubyGems).
The reasons are the same as PR#1796 but would be incremental.
PR#1796's Reasons to do this:
* Most of the other ecosystem choices are the language name.
* Deal with the existing "non-reviewed" ruby-related advisories which have no value to be assigned.
This will help the GHSA staff to work some of the 142 "unreviewed" ruby advisories.
Query: type:unreviewed 'ruby'"
Here is the current list ruby-lang vulnerabilities: ruby-lang Security
I work on the https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db project.
CC: @taladrane