Skip to content

PLAN B: Add "Ruby" as new required ecosystem choice to sit beside "RubyGems" ecosystem #6676

@jasnow

Description

@jasnow

PLAN B: Add "Ruby" as new required ecosystem choice to sit beside "RubyGems" ecosystem

If PR#1796 is too much of a change to do ALL-AT-ONCE, then I suggest adding Ruby as new required ecosystem choice to sit beside "RubyGems" ecosystem**

This definition of the new "Ruby" ecosystem would be yes ruby but not RubyGem (not on RubyGems).

The reasons are the same as PR#1796 but would be incremental.

PR#1796's Reasons to do this:
   * Most of the other ecosystem choices are the language name.
 * Deal with the existing "non-reviewed" ruby-related advisories which have no value to be assigned.
This will help the GHSA staff to work some of the 142 "unreviewed" ruby advisories.

Query: type:unreviewed 'ruby'"
Here is the current list ruby-lang vulnerabilities: ruby-lang Security

I work on the https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db project.

CC: @taladrane

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions